๐—–๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐— ๐— ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ฌ - ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐——๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—– ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฌ & ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ -๐—ฉ๐—ฆ- ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ช๐—œ ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก

๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐——๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—– ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฌ & ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ -๐—ฉ๐—ฆ- ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ช๐—œ ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—ง๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก

๐—–๐—”๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐— ๐— ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ฌ

๐—œ๐—ก ๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—›๐—œ๐—š๐—› ๐—–๐—ข๐—จ๐—ฅ๐—ง ๐—ข๐—™ ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ช๐—œ

๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ก๐—–๐—œ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—š๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฅ๐—ฌ

๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐——๐—˜๐— ๐—ข๐—–๐—ฅ๐—”๐—ง๐—œ๐—– ๐—ฃ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—š๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ฃ๐—”๐—ฅ๐—ง๐—ฌ & ๐Ÿฒ ๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฆ -๐—ฉ๐—ฆ- ๐— ๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ช๐—œ ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—–๐—ง๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—–๐—ข๐— ๐— ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ข๐—ก

Judicial Review Cause No.19 of 2025 (Before Hon. Justice Chimbizgani Kacheche)

ย 

๐—•๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—˜๐—™ ๐—™๐—”๐—–๐—ง๐—ฆ:

The applicants commenced these judicial review proceedings seeking the following reliefs:

Image removed.A declaration that the respondentโ€™s decision to refuse the claimants an audit of the electoral process and the electronic management system is unlawful and unconstitutional as it goes against the administration of free and fair elections.

Image removed.A declaration that the respondentโ€™s decision to implement the use of electronic management device as a means of identifying voters at the 16th September, 2025 elections is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Image removed.A declaration that the respondentโ€™s decision to implement the electronic transmission of September 2025 Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government results and to

determine the national result using the result so transmitted is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Image removed.A prohibitory order, prohibiting the Respondent from implementing its decision to refuse the claimants an audit of the electoral process and the electronic management system.

Image removed.A prohibitory order, prohibiting the Respondent from implementing the use of electronic management device as a means of identifying voters at the 16th September, 2025 elections.

Image removed.A prohibitory order, prohibiting the Respondent from implementing the decision to use the electronic transmission of September 2025 Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government results and to determine the national result using the result electronically transmitted.

Image removed.An order like mandamus mandating the Respondent to allow the applicants to conduct an audit of the electoral process and the 3 electronic management system in preparation for the September, 2025 elections.

Image removed.An order like mandamus mandating the Respondent to use the voters register physically present at all polling stations as the only means of identifying voters in the September 2025 elections.

Image removed.An order like mandamus mandating the Respondent to implement physical transmission of the September, 2025 Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government results and to determine the national result on using the result physically transmitted.

Image removed.The applicants also applied for an order as to costs.

ย 

๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—š๐—”๐—Ÿ ๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—จ๐—˜:

Image removed.The decision to refuse the claimants an audit of the electoral process and the electronic management system against the principles of free and fair elections.

Image removed.The decision to implement the use of the electronic management device as a means of identifying voters at the 16th September, 2025 elections.

Image removed.The decision to implement the electronic transmission of September 2025 Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Government results and to determine the national result using the result electronically transmitted.

ย 

๐—ง๐—›๐—˜ ๐—™๐—œ๐—ก๐——๐—œ๐—ก๐—š:

Image removed.Refusal was within the powers of MEC. the commission was justified if could not be faulted for refusing to audit the electoral management

Image removed.The decisions of MEC were made outside timeframe of 90 days the requirement in the CPR, but it was in the public interest as such the court proceeded as it was based on illegality.

Image removed.Manual and bio metric means of voter identification are both to be used nothing contrary to the law for MEC to use both manual registers to identify a voter and bio metric

Image removed.Mec not precluded to transmit the results electronically but they have to wait for the manual transmission before announcing the results.

Image removed.Political parties are stake holders in an election they shouldnโ€™t have to demonstrate an interest to bring an electoral matter to court. But the 3rd to the 7th they did not have sufficient interest and are condemned in costs.

ย 

๐—ข๐—ฅ๐——๐—˜๐—ฅ: Application dismissed.

Stay connected for the Full Ruling and more court updates!

Website - www.judiciary.mw

X - x.com/MalawiJudiciary

LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/malawi-judiciary/

Facebook - https://web.facebook.com/MalawiJudiciary

WhatsApp - https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbBCCVQEwEk1gtRUrC1q

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/@Malawi.Judiciary

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.