๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐น ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ก๐ผ. ๐ญ๐ฏ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฎ
๐ ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ผ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐บ๐๐ฒ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ & ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ (๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐ณ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ช๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ป ๐ญ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐๐ฎ๐๐ผ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ธ๐ผ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฎ ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ) ๐ฉ. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฑ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น
๐๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ
The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal has delivered a ruling in the matter of Mzamo Samuel Gama and Webster Gama v. The Administrator General, reversing a previous decision of the High Court which had dismissed the appellantsโ claim as statute-barred. The case concerns the long-standing administration of the estate of the late Weston Zondwayo Yokoniya Gama and the alleged failure by the Administrator General to properly manage and account for funds belonging to the estate.
๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ
The matter originates from the year 1991, when the Administrator General took control of MK4,772.62 as part of the deceased's estate, with instructions to invest the amount and not distribute it until the youngest child of the deceased attained the age of 21. In 2018, the appellants, being direct beneficiaries of the estate, requested an account of the funds and any investment returns. Unsatisfied with the response, they commenced legal proceedings in the High Court of Malawi (Lilongwe District Registry) seeking declarations that the Administrator General was both a statutory trustee and an institutional constructive trustee under the Trustee Act.
The appellants further sought restitution of the original sum together with compound interest at a rate 10% above the prevailing commercial bank lending rate, dating back to 4th August 1991. In the alternative, they sought compensation for the same under the principle of money had and received. They also claimed costs of the action.
๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด
The High Court, however, dismissed the case in November 2019, on the basis that it was statute-barred, according to Section 20 of the Limitation Act which required that actions based on a will should be brought within 12 years; whereas the Appellant herein brought it on the 13th year. The High Court further declined to be guided by the provisions of Section 19 of Limitation Act as prayed by the Appellant herein because the said provision dealt with trusts, while the present action was not based on trust arrangements.
๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐
Dissatisfied with the ruling, the appellants appealed to the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal, for a reversal of the said ruling, arguing that the lower court erred in holding that the Appellant Case was statute-barred. They further claimed that the learned Judge erred in declining to be guided by the Appellant's pleadings which clearly showed that the Appellant's case was based on trust and fraud.
๐ฆ๐๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐
The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal, comprising the Honourable the Deputy Chief Justice Lovemore Chikopa, SC, Justices of Appeal Frank Kapanda, SC, Healey Potani SC, John Katsala, SC, Charles Mkandawire, SC, Sylvester Kalembera, SC, Dingiswayo Madise, SC, Rowland Mbvundula, SC, and Dorothy nyaKaunda Kamanga, SC, ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น.
The Court found that there was clear evidence that the Administrator General had acknowledged receipt of the funds in question and that a statutory constructive trust had indeed been created. The Court further found that there is no dispute of facts in the matter and ordered that the matter be sent back to the court below for trial before a different judge.
The Court also held that costs of the appeal and below should be borne by the appellant.
- 40 views