๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€: ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—”๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ผ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ ๐—˜๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ

๐— ๐—ฆ๐—–๐—” ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—น ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ก๐—ผ. ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ

๐— ๐˜‡๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ผ ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ & ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ (๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ณ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ญ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ผ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜†๐—ฎ ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ) ๐—ฉ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น

๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—๐˜‚๐—น๐˜† ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ

The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal has delivered a ruling in the matter of Mzamo Samuel Gama and Webster Gama v. The Administrator General, reversing a previous decision of the High Court which had dismissed the appellantsโ€™ claim as statute-barred. The case concerns the long-standing administration of the estate of the late Weston Zondwayo Yokoniya Gama and the alleged failure by the Administrator General to properly manage and account for funds belonging to the estate.

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ

The matter originates from the year 1991, when the Administrator General took control of MK4,772.62 as part of the deceased's estate, with instructions to invest the amount and not distribute it until the youngest child of the deceased attained the age of 21. In 2018, the appellants, being direct beneficiaries of the estate, requested an account of the funds and any investment returns. Unsatisfied with the response, they commenced legal proceedings in the High Court of Malawi (Lilongwe District Registry) seeking declarations that the Administrator General was both a statutory trustee and an institutional constructive trustee under the Trustee Act.

The appellants further sought restitution of the original sum together with compound interest at a rate 10% above the prevailing commercial bank lending rate, dating back to 4th August 1991. In the alternative, they sought compensation for the same under the principle of money had and received. They also claimed costs of the action.

๐—›๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด

The High Court, however, dismissed the case in November 2019, on the basis that it was statute-barred, according to Section 20 of the Limitation Act which required that actions based on a will should be brought within 12 years; whereas the Appellant herein brought it on the 13th year. The High Court further declined to be guided by the provisions of Section 19 of Limitation Act as prayed by the Appellant herein because the said provision dealt with trusts, while the present action was not based on trust arrangements.

๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜

Dissatisfied with the ruling, the appellants appealed to the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal, for a reversal of the said ruling, arguing that the lower court erred in holding that the Appellant Case was statute-barred. They further claimed that the learned Judge erred in declining to be guided by the Appellant's pleadings which clearly showed that the Appellant's case was based on trust and fraud.

๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜

The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal, comprising the Honourable the Deputy Chief Justice Lovemore Chikopa, SC, Justices of Appeal Frank Kapanda, SC, Healey Potani SC, John Katsala, SC, Charles Mkandawire, SC, Sylvester Kalembera, SC, Dingiswayo Madise, SC, Rowland Mbvundula, SC, and Dorothy nyaKaunda Kamanga, SC, ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น.

The Court found that there was clear evidence that the Administrator General had acknowledged receipt of the funds in question and that a statutory constructive trust had indeed been created. The Court further found that there is no dispute of facts in the matter and ordered that the matter be sent back to the court below for trial before a different judge.

The Court also held that costs of the appeal and below should be borne by the appellant.

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.