1 minute
On 26 May 2025, the High Court, sitting as a three-Judge panel comprising Honourable Justice Mzonde Mvula, Honourable Justice Howard Pemba, and Honourable Justice Eddah Ngwira-Mwakibinga, delivered its judgment in the case of ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ช๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐๐ณ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ธ๐ช ๐๐ฐ๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐๐ด๐ด๐ฐ๐ค๐ช๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ท ๐๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐บ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฐ๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ต๐ต๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐บ ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ.
The Court ruled in favour of the claimant, declaring the Guidelines for Constituency Development Fund and Water Resources Fund (2022), issued by the Ministry of Local Government, unconstitutional. The Guidelines had vested Members of Parliament (MPs) with primary responsibility over local development plans and granted them voting rights in local councils as ex-officio members under section 5(1) of the Local Government Act.
The Court observed that a Member of Parliament, as part of the Legislature under section 8 of the Constitution, participates in the enactment of laws, but by assuming an ex-officio role in the Council with powers to determine the management and control of development funds including voting rights, undertakes functions that fall within the domain of the Executive under section 7. According to the Court, this dual role contravenes the doctrine of separation of powers under sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Constitution.
As a result, the Court declared the Guidelines invalid to the extent of their inconsistency with the Constitution. It further directed that the Guidelines be revised to exclude MPs from such roles and that alternative stakeholders be identified to uphold constitutional compliance and the integrity of the oversight function.
- 355 views