1 minute
๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐ฒ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ก๐ผ ๐ญ๐ญ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ
๐๐๐๐ผ๐ป ๐ ๐ธ๐๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฎ (๐๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐)
๐ฉ.
๐ ๐ฟ ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ป๐ด๐ฎ (๐ญ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐)
๐ ๐ฟ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ธ๐ฎ (๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐)
๐ ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐ป๐๐ผ๐น๐ฎ (๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐)
๐ฑ๐๐ต ๐๐๐ด๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ - ๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ผ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐, ๐๐
The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal has sustained an order of stay of execution in the matter of Dyson Mkwapatira V. Mr. Malunga, Mr. Manyeka, and Mr. Khonyola, pending the determination of an appeal.
The case arises from a land dispute in which the High Court had dismissed Mr. Mkwapatiraโs claim and denied him an injunction. Dissatisfied with that decision, the applicant sought a stay of execution before the High Court, which was refused. This prompted an application to the Supreme Court of Appeal under its concurrent jurisdiction.
In his ruling, Honourable Justice Dingiswayo Madise, SC, JA, noted that courts generally do not stay execution of judgments unless there are special circumstances, such as where failing to do so would cause great injustice and render the appeal nugatory.
Evidence presented showed that third parties, invited by the respondents, were erecting structures on the disputed land, a fact not contested by the respondents. Justice Madise held that allowing such developments to continue before the appeal is heard would prejudice the applicantโs rights.
The Court overruled a preliminary objection by the respondents challenging the validity of the appeal, clarifying that under Order 3 Rule 3 of the Supreme Court of Appeal Rules, a notice of appeal may be filed before leave to appeal is granted, provided leave is subsequently obtained.
The stay of execution has been sustained on the following conditions:
1. The applicant to settle the record of appeal within 14 days.
2. The applicant to enter the appeal with the Registrar of the Court within 7 days thereafter.
Costs were ordered to be in the cause.
- 95 views